This Wall is for Artwork

Photos vary, dating from August 2023 to December 2024.

I’m on winter break and cleared out the backlog of articles, so to kill some more free time here’s another post. I was originally going to sandwich this one into Knowlton’s entry, but after mulling over how much yapping I plan on doing in that one, I figured I should at least attempt to make it more readable and air out all my thoughts on this subject separately without worrying about length.  This will be a more “meta” post, where I write more than I have photos. (Stay tuned for more of these in the future, but much of my website’s entries will still be photo-dominated.)


Knowlton Hall’s graffiti was one of those things I kind of took for granted until it was gone. I never really considered it worth taking pictures of, beyond the odd quirky ones I found entertaining, and as a result I can count on one hand the amount of photos I have of the graffiti before its removal. The whole issue has become a gigantic debacle within the Knowlton administration and community, something I find very odd considering that this is the same school that wants to teach you to break the rules and think outside the box. Since this website is in no way affiliated with Ohio State or Knowlton, I can tell things exactly how they are, without worrying about the overreach of the faculty.

History

Since the very nature of graffiti is taboo and underground, there’s no “John Herrick write-up” documenting the history of Knowlton’s stairwells. I’m using Knowlton’s student magazine One:Twelve as a source for a lot of the history, but some of it is also anecdotal, based on my notes from Mack Scogin Merrill Elam’s Baumer lecture and the school’s panel discussions about this topic. Therefore, take all of this information with a grain of salt, and I welcome corrections in the comments.


Graffiti in the Knowlton stairwells goes back many years, probably back to the building’s opening in 2004. The messaging varied, sometimes being motivational, playful, or even just for expression’s sake. One:Twelve’s article has some examples of the lighter graffiti at the beginning. My photos include the kind I found to be funny or interesting:


A poem (brightened):



“I don’t need luck”... this one made a reappearance on the later butcher paper:



Underside of the stairs, pre-removal:



My personal favorite…this one kept me going during my long Knowlton nights:



One:Twelve mentions the racist and antisemitic graffiti found in Hitchcock Hall in 2022, which was sort of a precursor, but the real catalyst to Knowlton’s graffiti removal was the pro-Palestinian messages that began to appear after October 2023. At first, only the messages that affirmed Palestine were painted over (in this harsh orange paint):


(One:Twelve)


After new pro-Palestinian graffiti was written over the orange paint, Knowlton’s then-director sent an email to the students in December 2023, stating that all of the graffiti would be removed and security cameras would be installed in the stairwells. This was met with harsh backlash by students, which was generally blown off by administration. It was made painfully clear that though student expression was allowed and encouraged, the stairwells would no longer be the place to do so.



Things quieted down after the initial uproar, but students were still planning an outlet. Knowlton Society, the school’s newest student organization, was founded as a direct response to the graffiti removal in spring 2024. Their president sought to reclaim that lost method of student expression in a more organized manner, as opposed to the disordered backlash that was occurring previously. 


The wiring for the cameras before their installation.


The discussion roared right back into the spotlight after Mack Scogin Merrill Elam’s Baumer lecture. I was in attendance and took notes. A One:Twelve writer asked them: “...what were your original intentions for the stairwells?” Scogin simply replied, “To put things on them.” The listeners erupted with applause. Another student involved with Knowlton Society asked a more blunt question, along the lines of “What are your thoughts on the restriction of Knowlton’s intended usage [balconies] and the surveillance of student activity?” Scogin and Elam affirmed the previous statement, and encouraged the students to fight back and that the urge to write on walls is natural, appearing in ancient Mesopotamia and Greece. Naturally everyone was pleased but the administration, and as I looked over I saw lots of shaking heads and facepalming in the peanut gallery. I guess it didn’t occur to them that the two old farts needed to be programmed not to badmouth Knowlton’s administration, but these were the same people basically getting on their knees for Scogin and Elam prior to the beginning of the lecture. You’re bringing in the architects who designed Knowlton Hall of all places, how did you think they were going to respond?


An immediate response to the lecture was butcher paper taped up to the stairwells within the next few days, which featured many of the previous messages. I myself put up a quote from Mack Scogin and flipped the nearby camera the bird after, which was rather cathartic. Two of these posters stood, the earlier one lasting about a week and the later one two weeks. Apparently, the trumped-up reasoning for their removal is that it’s a “fire hazard”... located inside concrete stairwells, which are literally designed to be the fireproof parts of a building. (Knowlton is also framed in concrete and steel, not wood. Seriously, you’re trying to tell the architecture majors that a single sheet of paper is a fire hazard?) 



Knowlton Society concurrently encouraged the marking of other surfaces across Knowlton, including the glass windows and walls outside the stairwells. This art lasted a little longer, about three weeks to a month, until it was likewise removed after the administration caught wind of the dry-erase markers being left out for anyone to write things. 


One:Twelve put up posters with links for their article, which had the “THIS WALL IS NOT FOR ARTWORK.” text on it and empty space for people to write beneath. Some of these posters are still on the walls, even in the stairwells, but Knowlton’s staff is not fond of them. Right now, this is the only method of expression reminiscent of graffiti that is available to students, and it will likely not remain that way for long.



The current position of the administration is that the stairwells will remain barren and monitored, and students must find a way to express themselves elsewhere that is impermanent (so that anything undesirable can be removed) and relatively clandestine (so that the area can be avoided during tours of the building for prospective students/rich donors).

My Thoughts

Regarding the graffiti’s existence, since that may sound outlandish to non-Knowlton students, I have heard anecdotally that Harvard’s architecture building famously has graffiti in its stairwells as well. Since architecture is a discipline based on precedent, there is one for this situation as well.


The entire reason the stairwell graffiti was removed was that people started writing pro-Palestinian messages, and that conflicted with Ohio State’s financial interests, so it was removed.


There is nothing more to it.


You may have noticed that I am using the terms “pro-Palestinian” and “affirming Palestine,” because that was exactly what this graffiti said. It was not antisemitic, like the earlier Hitchcock Hall graffiti, because criticizing the actions of the state of Israel and Zionism is not an act of antisemitism. It is about defending the victims of genocide and opening the eyes of the general public to the atrocities that are being committed there. The moment I saw the first “FREE GAZA” message in the stairwell, I knew it would be a matter of time before it all came down.


As you should be familiar by now, Ohio State receives a lot of its money from interests that support the state of Israel, and in so doing condones (and arguably enables) the genocide that Israel is actively committing. The heavy strides that the college is taking to suppress any criticism of this activity is very telling of where its priorities lie. For example, having snipers on top of the Union during a pro-Palestinian protest earlier this year. And this is nothing new


Within Knowlton itself, I am very disappointed with the way that the situation is being handled. Administration continues to condescend to its students and will not budge on restoring the student voice that has been lost. Knowlton’s professors are generally in agreement with the students, but the higher-ups above them are the ones who make the decisions. It is very clear that student expression will no longer be allowed, unless it is through a method that the administration can monitor, alter, or expunge as they please.


The constant surveillance in the stairwells is Orwellian. There is something so defeating about being conspicuously watched every time one ascends or descends the stairs; that the urge to quell this graffiti is much more important to the university than personal freedom and existing as someone who isn’t just a cog in the capitalist machine. (Although Knowlton does encourage designing in the minimalist, Corbusian language of architecture, so maybe that’s not too far out of character.) Ohio State has around 4000 cameras on its campus, but many of these are placed in areas that are generally out of public view (e.g. atop buildings), and as a result this feeling only persists within Knowlton’s stairs. Additionally, a lot of female students are bringing up the fact that they still feel unsafe at night or when they are alone in the building; and there are still no cameras in studio spaces, where rampant theft and safety issues occur. Ohio State is also well-known for its poor safety, but I’m happy to see that we’re funneling the department’s money to where it really matters!


It’s hard not to take a defeatist attitude towards the situation, because I think most people know full well that nothing is going to change, and Knowlton and Ohio State are set in their ways when it comes to this issue. This was painfully obvious to me during the panel discussion the administration held a few weeks back about the graffiti. My fellow students and I are doing what we can to try and fight this, but at present things look pretty bleak. 


I think this will be a post I come back to and edit if more information comes out, the situation changes, or just adding more thoughts of mine as they come to mind. I also welcome any constructive comments below. Thanks for reading.



Sources:

https://onetwelveksa.substack.com/p/retelling-the-history-of-knowltons

https://www.thelantern.com/2024/04/university-says-officers-had-readied-firearms-directed-toward-protesters-from-ohio-unions-roof-once-arrests-began/

https://library.osu.edu/site/dissent/

https://dps.osu.edu/news/2023/04/04/news-increased-surveillance-helps-solve-campus-crimes

Campbell Hall pt. 1 - "Under Construction"

Photos from November 2024.

Campbell Hall was actively under renovation while I attended Ohio State, one of a few such cases. Although I will have to postpone my normal coverage until it is completed, this will be an extra special article, as I did a site visit into the construction site for my Materials and Envelopes class. I still wish I was able to see it in its pre-renovation state, just for comparison’s sake. Campbell Hall is located on south campus, bordered by Lazenby Hall and the Psychology Building to the north, Jennings Hall to the south, Mirror Lake to the east, and Neil Avenue Garage to the west.

History

The Home Economics Building viewed from across Mirror Lake in 1917. (Buckeye Stroll)


Campbell Hall was designed by university architect Joseph N. Bradford in 1915. The building has brick bearing walls, with Neoclassical ornament and details. This is the first time I have proven that John Herrick was wrong--in his write-up, he claims it has a reinforced concrete frame. However, my professor is an architect involved with the construction, and he claimed that it has brick bearing walls. Upon my visit, my professor was correct, as you will see in my photos. The only concrete portion of the original building is the floor plates.


Campbell Hall was built starting September 1915 and was fully completed and approved by the Board of Trustees in January 1917, though the building began use in December 1916. Campbell Hall was constructed to house the growing Home Economics department, which at one point taught half of all female students. 


The Home Economics Building’s original footprint.


Campbell Hall in 1926. (University Archives)


Originally, Campbell Hall was known as the “Home Economics Building” for a few years after its construction. In August 1921, the Board of Trustees named the building after Elizabeth Owens Campbell, the wife of Ohio governor James F. Campbell.


Campbell Hall in 1954. (Buckeye Stroll)


In 1961, university architect W. E. Linch planned an addition, which extends outward from the south wing of the existing building. As was typical for his designs, the new structure was designed in a clashing Mid-Century Modern style, and it does not harmonize with the existing building. It was built starting June 1961 by Sheaf Construction Co. and was completed on September 19 of that year. After the addition, the building came to 58,212 net assignable square feet.


Campbell Hall’s footprint after W. E. Linch’s addition.


The addition under construction in 1961. (Buckeye Stroll)


Another addition has since been constructed, as the current roof plan of Campbell Hall differs from John Herrick’s diagrams. It was probably built after 1986, as John Herrick’s document does not mention another addition, and his last addendum was that June. Given the Postmodern appearance and faithful imitation of original masonry and proportions, I believe it was built between 1986-2000. My professor mentioned in lecture that it was built in 1993 and has a steel frame. I could not find any photos of this addition beyond my own.


Campbell Hall’s current footprint.


W. E. Linch’s addition, with Jennings Hall in the background. (University Archives)


Before 2023, Campbell Hall was the home of many programs belonging to the Department of Human Sciences, including Fashion and Retail Studies, Family Financial Services, Hospitality Management, Human Development and Family Science, and Human Nutrition. The Historic Costume and Textiles Collection was also housed there. As the building is currently empty, Evans Lab houses the displaced faculty.


Campbell Hall is currently being renovated to update classroom spaces and replace aging infrastructure like the roof and windows. The design process took place between 2021-2023, Schooley Caldwell being the commissioned architect. Construction began July 2023, being executed by CK Construction, and is expected to finish by spring 2026. While I am glad that most of the building is being preserved, and later renovations are actually being reverted such as restoring crown molding that was covered by a drop ceiling, I wish they would keep the windows and other original details.


A view of Campbell Hall’s interior during its renovation, showing the previously hidden crown molding. (OSU Building the Future)


The main feature of the project seems to be a three-story atrium in the lobby, which will serve as a community space and bring natural light in. Additionally, the auditorium will be renovated, and accessibility will be improved.

Photos

I know these pictures aren’t the greatest example of my photography skills, but I was wearing a hard hat, so I had to “hip-fire” a lot of these using only the screen and not the viewfinder like a normal person. The lighting was often poor as well.


Before entering the building, we gathered on the west side. The place is pretty messy-looking:



The 1993 addition is on the left, while the 1961 portion is on the right. We entered where the loading dock was, which was at the border between the Postmodern addition and the original building.


Photo of the loading dock in August 2024. The glass curtain wall above was already removed by that time.


Inside, the area had been chopped out to accommodate the new three-story atrium. Note the long beam above -- apparently this was necessary after the steel frame was altered.



One of the two “light courts” of the building:



This was the first sight upon entering the building. I began to lag behind a bit as everyone followed the worker conducting the tour ahead, which established I’d be “bringing up the rear to get my photos” and let me get better shots without people in the way.



We stopped in this room to discuss the plans for the area.



The space was originally a classroom, but it is being subdivided into faculty offices. Note the lines on the floor -- these measure out where the steel studs will go for their walls. Additionally, the original central doorway is now bricked up, and another entrance has been added to the western corner.



The CMU lintel is necessary to stabilize the walls surrounding it. Look at these bearing walls--four courses thick!



The hallways have all sorts of fun electrical junk, and many different eras of paint are visible:



This area is part of the basement underneath the central stairs. Note the massive exposed brick walls.



Original light fixture:



This crown molding is really pretty, and I’m glad it is being preserved.



Another empty classroom awaiting its subdivision:



A lot of the original wood doors also remain intact. I’m hoping this means they’ll be preserved as part of the renovation.



The stairwell:



Note the studs at the top here--code today dictates that stairs must have doors enclosing them.



This lovely original wood paneling would have been your first sight upon entering Campbell Hall from its main entrance. I believe the worker or my professor said explicitly that this is being preserved.



This is the fancy central room on the top floor, where the largest windows are:



Another similar room to the ground floor here, but the studs are actually in place:



Here’s a rare look at something I probably wasn’t supposed to be taking pictures of--a floor plan of the third floor, albeit focused on the electrical work. Now I know where all the security cameras will be on the third floor of Campbell Hall.



At this point, we had reached the top of the atrium:



We then entered the 1961 addition, which was more stripped down and largely unremarkable. This was towards the end of the tour, and our time there was more brief. Here’s some more framing in that area and the southwest stairwell:



Hole in the floor:



We exited the building and went to the front for some more info. I learned that these masonry panels are original, and they were later obscured by the more elaborate metal ones:



I think everyone else in the class was bored by this, but I found it really interesting, as it was my first time inside a construction site. Stay tuned for the next article(s) on Campbell Hall--apparently we are visiting the site again in the spring to study the systems being put in, and I will conclude the series with photos of the completed building.


Click here for part 2


Sources:

https://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/24059

https://library.osu.edu/site/buckeyestroll/

https://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/37314

https://buildingthefuture.osu.edu/campbellhall

https://campbellhall-renovation.ehe.osu.edu/

https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/ohio-state-university/ohio-state-approves-150-million-in-construction-projects/